Module 6 EDU 790: Digital Privacy Laws

 

Many people find studying laws boring, but I found that very interesting. I was interested in attending law school when I was in high school. After learning so much over the past several weeks about privacy and data mining, it's more imperative than ever to have protections in place for people, but especially for our most vulnerable students. I found the Student Data Privacy Laws handout to be very helpful in understanding each law as well as the image below. 



                                                                     Image Source


I think these laws do quite a bit to protect children, but I think the age should be 17 and not 13. Our students have underdeveloped frontal lobes which gets in their way of emotional/impulse control, long term planning, self-awareness, understanding consequences, and decision making. They also have an overactive limbic system which explains the more impulsive behavior, increase in risk taking, and emotional highs and lows, as well as the reward seeking. Due to these brain structures, teenagers need more protection, not less. They cannot always process or understand the importance of privacy and may rebel against their guardians, so something in place to protect them from the federal and state government to block predatory sites and companies trying to turn a profit is important. Increasing the age is also needed for students who qualify for special education or English language learner services. Can kids lie? Yes, but that's why parental controls and responsibility is so important. There are so many apps available to help control child access to many sites (out of school) that can be used for computers and phones. 


I don't believe that companies will regulate themselves. It was eye opening to read about the $170 million payout that Google had to pay for YouTube violations. Facebook was also in hot water in 2019 over its violation of privacy and the Cambridge Analytic scandal. I predict in the future that more laws concerning privacy and technology will be passed and the Supreme Court will way in. 

As an example of the change that YouTube made to protect children's privacy was evident when I was watching Small Talk by Lambros Fisfis, a Greek comedian, on YouTube where he interviews Greek children about topics like love, Christmas, money, national pride, and documents their often innocent and hilarious responses. However, because the videos contain minors, there is always a disclaimer in the beginning of his videos and the comment section is disabled. I think this is appropriate because the children should be protected for their participation on the show.





I'm glad that Illinois is leading the way and passing stricter privacy laws. I am interested to see how SOPPA will manifest itself at our school and district. Chicago Public Schools (CPS) is so large and houses so much student data and has large contracts for technology, so I think it's good that they increasing protections and parents will have more information about vendors. Our website at my school does not have information about any of these laws, and I assume they rely on CPS' website to do that job. CPS also has a section of their site for people interested in doing research on the district and students and a process to vet those research proposals.





Comments

  1. You are correct in that the companies will never regulate themselves- there is too much money to be made. An interesting read about this is a book by Jaron Lanier called "10 arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now." What's great about it is that Jaron was a "silicon valley tech guy" so he drives this point home. Also well said was your comment about the developing brain. That's a compelling argument! The only thing that gives me pause about that one is that the brain is still developing until around the age of 25 (which explains some of my son's opinions lol). I'm not sure what the answer is. Thanks for the fantastic FERPA image, too!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed the graphic your included about all the privacy laws. It's the perfect "cheat sheet" for people to quickly understand what each law does and protects. I think that it is our responsibility as educators to teach our students (and even our colleagues) about being safe online. I agree with you that companies do not have a good track record of regulating themselves. It's a little sickening if you ask me. They are allowed to sell and safe their users' data without much push back from federal agencies. I do not like that it seems like if they have enough money, then the rules don't apply to them. This is why we must protect ourselves and teach our students to do the same!
    -Amanda

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like your comments on how teenagers are still developing their brain and are prone to higher risk behavior. I think it is important for media to consider that point of view when creating content that is consumed by young adults in that age bracket. We all thought or felt similar to that at one point or another. I also agree with how you pointed out that companies would not regulate themselves. I do not think that most companies profits are subject to the same level of ethics that us citizens adhere to and therefore are able to exploit information at a mass level. It all feels quite dystopian sometimes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment